This Week at the Ninth: Implied FDCA Preemption
Welcome to Left Coast Appeals
At Left Coast Appeals, we provide insights into all things Ninth Circuit. Check out our Ninth Circuit Statistics page, which offers an empirical window into the Court’s workings. At our En Banc Tracker, we monitor the Court’s busy en banc proceedings. And at This Week at the Ninth, we highlight key recent decisions.
Follow us on Twitter @LeftCoastAppeal. And check out our sister blog Federal Circuitry, which takes a data-driven look at the Federal Circuit.
- This week, the Ninth Circuit addresses the statutory prohibition on private enforcement actions under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. NEXUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. V. CENTRAL ADMIXTURE PHARMACY SERVICES, INC. The Court holds that a drug manufacturer’s suit against a compounding pharmacy for violating state... ›
This Week at the Ninth: Class Opt-Outs and Non-Renewed Contracts
By: James R. Sigel
This week, the Ninth Circuit addresses the immediate appealability of orders invalidating class action opt-outs, and considers whether a decision not to renew a contract is an adverse employment action for purposes of a Title IX discrimination claim. AGUILAR v. WALGREEN CO. The Court... ›This Week at the Ninth: School Groups and Minimum Contacts
This week, the Ninth Circuit addresses the constitutionality of a school district’s decision to revoke official status for a student group that disapproves of same sex relationships, and the minimum contacts necessary to exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign adult entertainment website. FELLOWSHIP OF... ›This Week at the Ninth: Signal Piracy and Supplemental Jurisdiction
This week, the Ninth Circuit examines the requirements for signal piracy liability under the Cable Communications Policy Act and Communications Act, and explains when courts must give notice before dismissing a state law claim on jurisdictional grounds. G AND G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS V.... ›This Week at the Ninth: Danish Cults and Defamation
By: James R. Sigel
This week, the Ninth Circuit addresses the First Amendment “limited-purpose public figure” doctrine in the context of a charitable organization’s fundraising activities. PLANET AID, INC. v. REVEAL The Court holds that charitable organizations that engage in public fundraising activities must prove “actual malice” when... ›This Week at the Ninth: Delegation Clauses and the False Claims Act
By: James R. Sigel
This week, the Court addresses whether a court or an arbitrator must consider a sovereign immunity defense to arbitration, and applies the False Claims Act to a defendant’s allegedly fraudulent Medicare billing practices. CAREMARK, LLC v. CHICKASAW NATION The Court holds that an Indian... ›This Week at the Ninth: Fair Use and Arbitral Summonses
By: James R. Sigel
This week, the Court considers the fair use defense to copyright infringement and addresses the proper venue for petitions to enforce arbitral summonses. McGUCKEN v. PUB OCEAN LIMITED The Court rejects a fair use defense to copyright infringement for the reproduction of photographs in... ›This Week at the Ninth: Public Fora and Pretrial Disclosures
By: James R. Sigel
This week, the Court wrestles with a thorny First Amendment question that has divided other Courts of Appeals and considers district courts’ ability to impose sanctions under Rule 37(c)(1). GARNIER v. O’CONNOR-RATCLIFF The Court holds that two local officials’ blocking of particular constituents’ comments... ›This Week at the Ninth: Nationwide Contacts
This week, the Ninth Circuit digs into a personal jurisdiction case involving a Vietnamese music company. LANG VAN, INC. v. VNG CORPORATION The Court holds that exercising personal jurisdiction over a Vietnamese company was appropriate under Rule 4(k)(2) where the plaintiff’s federal claims alleged... ›This Week at the Ninth: Unpaid Sellers and Waived Trial Rights
By: James R. Sigel
This week, the Ninth Circuit determines whether an online produce wholesaler can file suit under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, and answers a novel question about whether a party that contractually waived its jury trial rights can object to an opponent’s withdrawal of a... ›